<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Constitution Party of Texas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cptexas.us/home/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cptexas.us/home</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 02:41:39 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Doesn’t the Constitution Party Endorse Ron Paul for President? by Good Resource for Constitutionists &#124; Constitution Party of Texas</title>
		<link>http://cptexas.us/home/2012/01/why-doesnt-the-constitution-party-endorse-ron-paul-for-president.html#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Good Resource for Constitutionists &#124; Constitution Party of Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 02:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cptexas.us/home/?p=1144#comment-117</guid>
		<description>[...] For those who bring up Ron Paul and ask why you&#8217;re not supporting him, you might want to ask t... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For those who bring up Ron Paul and ask why you&#8217;re not supporting him, you might want to ask t&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bill Of Rights Is No More by First NDAA; Now Enemy Expatriation Act &#124; Constitution Party of Texas</title>
		<link>http://cptexas.us/home/2012/01/bill-of-rights-is-no-more.html#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>First NDAA; Now Enemy Expatriation Act &#124; Constitution Party of Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 05:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cptexas.us/home/?p=1030#comment-115</guid>
		<description>[...] Bill Of Rights Is No More [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bill Of Rights Is No More [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Candidate for MT. Attorney General, Shockley, Holds Shocking View of the Constitution by Texas Workers Compensation Attorney Protected Retired Police Officer Comp Rights</title>
		<link>http://cptexas.us/home/2012/01/candidate-for-mt-attorney-general-shockley-holds-shocking-view-of-the-constitution.html#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Texas Workers Compensation Attorney Protected Retired Police Officer Comp Rights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cptexas.us/home/?p=1045#comment-114</guid>
		<description>[...] It is no surprise then, that Shockley denies the power of the States to interpose against federal usurpations. It is doubtful if Shockley has a plan to substantively reduce federal intrusion and to respond to federal violations of the constitution. This is evident given his campaign website statement that he opposed Montana&#8217;s citizen initiative in 2004 for medical marijuana use because it “was illegal under the federal law.” Never mind that growing and using a natural plant was never a matter to be regulated by Congress. To Shockley, it is not the supreme law of the land that guides his position on the issue, but federal law. Shockley&#8217;s position is dangerous to Montana.Source: cptexas.us [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It is no surprise then, that Shockley denies the power of the States to interpose against federal usurpations. It is doubtful if Shockley has a plan to substantively reduce federal intrusion and to respond to federal violations of the constitution. This is evident given his campaign website statement that he opposed Montana&#8217;s citizen initiative in 2004 for medical marijuana use because it “was illegal under the federal law.” Never mind that growing and using a natural plant was never a matter to be regulated by Congress. To Shockley, it is not the supreme law of the land that guides his position on the issue, but federal law. Shockley&#8217;s position is dangerous to Montana.Source: cptexas.us [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bill Of Rights Is No More by First NDAA; Now Enemy Expatriation Act &#124; Constitution Party of Texas</title>
		<link>http://cptexas.us/home/2012/01/bill-of-rights-is-no-more.html#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>First NDAA; Now Enemy Expatriation Act &#124; Constitution Party of Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 05:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cptexas.us/home/?p=1030#comment-113</guid>
		<description>[...] I invite readers to see my column on the NDAA. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I invite readers to see my column on the NDAA. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

